bzr branch
http://gegoxaren.bato24.eu/bzr/brz/remove-bazaar
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1 |
====================== |
2 |
Bazaar Developer Guide |
|
3 |
====================== |
|
|
974.1.26
by aaron.bentley at utoronto
merged mbp@sourcefrog.net-20050817233101-0939da1cf91f2472 |
4 |
|
|
3314.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add Developer's Guide text about PPA builds |
5 |
This document describes the Bazaar internals and the development process. |
6 |
It's meant for people interested in developing Bazaar, and some parts will |
|
7 |
also be useful to people developing Bazaar plugins. |
|
8 |
||
9 |
If you have any questions or something seems to be incorrect, unclear or |
|
10 |
missing, please talk to us in ``irc://irc.freenode.net/#bzr``, or write to |
|
11 |
the Bazaar mailing list. To propose a correction or addition to this |
|
12 |
document, send a merge request or new text to the mailing list. |
|
13 |
||
14 |
The current version of this document is available in the file |
|
15 |
``doc/developers/HACKING.txt`` in the source tree, or at |
|
16 |
http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/developer-guide/HACKING.html |
|
17 |
||
|
3464.3.5
by Martin Pool
ReST tweaks and link back from HACKING to catalog |
18 |
See also: |
19 |
`Bazaar Developer Documentation Catalog <../../developers/index.html>`_. |
|
20 |
||
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
21 |
.. contents:: |
22 |
||
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
23 |
|
24 |
Getting Started |
|
25 |
############### |
|
26 |
||
27 |
Exploring the Bazaar Platform |
|
28 |
============================= |
|
29 |
||
30 |
Before making changes, it's a good idea to explore the work already |
|
31 |
done by others. Perhaps the new feature or improvement you're looking |
|
32 |
for is available in another plug-in already? If you find a bug, |
|
33 |
perhaps someone else has already fixed it? |
|
34 |
||
35 |
To answer these questions and more, take a moment to explore the |
|
36 |
overall Bazaar Platform. Here are some links to browse: |
|
37 |
||
38 |
* The Plugins page on the Wiki - http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrPlugins |
|
39 |
||
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
40 |
* The Bazaar product family on Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/bazaar |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
41 |
|
42 |
* Bug Tracker for the core product - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/ |
|
43 |
||
44 |
* Blueprint Tracker for the core product - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bzr/ |
|
45 |
||
46 |
If nothing else, perhaps you'll find inspiration in how other developers |
|
47 |
have solved their challenges. |
|
48 |
||
49 |
||
50 |
Planning and Discussing Changes |
|
51 |
=============================== |
|
52 |
||
53 |
There is a very active community around Bazaar. Mostly we meet on IRC |
|
54 |
(#bzr on irc.freenode.net) and on the mailing list. To join the Bazaar |
|
55 |
community, see http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrSupport. |
|
56 |
||
57 |
If you are planning to make a change, it's a very good idea to mention it |
|
58 |
on the IRC channel and/or on the mailing list. There are many advantages |
|
59 |
to involving the community before you spend much time on a change. |
|
60 |
These include: |
|
61 |
||
62 |
* you get to build on the wisdom on others, saving time |
|
63 |
||
64 |
* if others can direct you to similar code, it minimises the work to be done |
|
65 |
||
66 |
* it assists everyone in coordinating direction, priorities and effort. |
|
67 |
||
68 |
In summary, maximising the input from others typically minimises the |
|
69 |
total effort required to get your changes merged. The community is |
|
70 |
friendly, helpful and always keen to welcome newcomers. |
|
71 |
||
72 |
||
73 |
Bazaar Development in a Nutshell |
|
74 |
================================ |
|
75 |
||
76 |
Looking for a 10 minute introduction to submitting a change? |
|
77 |
See http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrGivingBack. |
|
78 |
||
79 |
TODO: Merge that Wiki page into this document. |
|
80 |
||
81 |
||
82 |
Understanding the Development Process |
|
83 |
===================================== |
|
84 |
||
85 |
The development team follows many best-practices including: |
|
86 |
||
87 |
* a public roadmap and planning process in which anyone can participate |
|
88 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
89 |
* time based milestones everyone can work towards and plan around |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
90 |
|
91 |
* extensive code review and feedback to contributors |
|
92 |
||
93 |
* complete and rigorous test coverage on any code contributed |
|
94 |
||
95 |
* automated validation that all tests still pass before code is merged |
|
96 |
into the main code branch. |
|
97 |
||
98 |
The key tools we use to enable these practices are: |
|
99 |
||
100 |
* Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ |
|
101 |
||
102 |
* Bazaar - http://bazaar-vcs.org/ |
|
103 |
||
104 |
* Bundle Buggy - http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/ |
|
105 |
||
106 |
* Patch Queue Manager - https://launchpad.net/pqm/ |
|
107 |
||
108 |
For further information, see http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrDevelopment. |
|
109 |
||
110 |
||
111 |
A Closer Look at the Merge & Review Process |
|
112 |
=========================================== |
|
113 |
||
114 |
If you'd like to propose a change, please post to the |
|
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
115 |
bazaar@lists.canonical.com list with a bundle, patch, or link to a |
116 |
branch. Put '[PATCH]' or '[MERGE]' in the subject so Bundle Buggy |
|
117 |
can pick it out, and explain the change in the email message text. |
|
118 |
Remember to update the NEWS file as part of your change if it makes any |
|
119 |
changes visible to users or plugin developers. Please include a diff |
|
120 |
against mainline if you're giving a link to a branch. |
|
121 |
||
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
122 |
You can generate a bundle like this:: |
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
123 |
|
124 |
bzr bundle > mybundle.patch |
|
125 |
||
126 |
A .patch extension is recommended instead of .bundle as many mail clients |
|
127 |
will send the latter as a binary file. If a bundle would be too long or your |
|
128 |
mailer mangles whitespace (e.g. implicitly converts Unix newlines to DOS |
|
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
129 |
newlines), use the merge-directive command instead like this:: |
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
130 |
|
131 |
bzr merge-directive http://bazaar-vcs.org http://example.org/my_branch > my_directive.patch |
|
132 |
||
133 |
See the help for details on the arguments to merge-directive. |
|
134 |
||
135 |
Please do **NOT** put [PATCH] or [MERGE] in the subject line if you don't |
|
136 |
want it to be merged. If you want comments from developers rather than |
|
137 |
to be merged, you can put '[RFC]' in the subject line. |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
138 |
|
139 |
Anyone is welcome to review code. There are broadly three gates for |
|
140 |
code to get in: |
|
141 |
||
142 |
* Doesn't reduce test coverage: if it adds new methods or commands, |
|
143 |
there should be tests for them. There is a good test framework |
|
144 |
and plenty of examples to crib from, but if you are having trouble |
|
145 |
working out how to test something feel free to post a draft patch |
|
146 |
and ask for help. |
|
147 |
||
148 |
* Doesn't reduce design clarity, such as by entangling objects |
|
149 |
we're trying to separate. This is mostly something the more |
|
150 |
experienced reviewers need to help check. |
|
151 |
||
152 |
* Improves bugs, features, speed, or code simplicity. |
|
153 |
||
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
154 |
Code that goes in should pass all three. The core developers take care |
155 |
to keep the code quality high and understandable while recognising that |
|
156 |
perfect is sometimes the enemy of good. (It is easy for reviews to make |
|
157 |
people notice other things which should be fixed but those things should |
|
158 |
not hold up the original fix being accepted. New things can easily be |
|
159 |
recorded in the Bug Tracker instead.) |
|
160 |
||
161 |
Anyone can "vote" on the mailing list. Core developers can also vote using |
|
162 |
Bundle Buggy. Here are the voting codes and their explanations. |
|
163 |
||
|
2654.1.1
by Aaron Bentley
Revise text about voting to match current system |
164 |
:approve: Reviewer wants this submission merged. |
165 |
:tweak: Reviewer wants this submission merged with small changes. (No |
|
166 |
re-review required.) |
|
167 |
:abstain: Reviewer does not intend to vote on this patch. |
|
168 |
:resubmit: Please make changes and resubmit for review. |
|
169 |
:reject: Reviewer doesn't want this kind of change merged. |
|
170 |
:comment: Not really a vote. Reviewer just wants to comment, for now. |
|
171 |
||
172 |
If a change gets two approvals from core reviewers, and no rejections, |
|
173 |
then it's OK to come in. Any of the core developers can bring it into the |
|
174 |
bzr.dev trunk and backport it to maintenance branches if required. The |
|
175 |
Release Manager will merge the change into the branch for a pending |
|
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
176 |
release, if any. As a guideline, core developers usually merge their own |
177 |
changes and volunteer to merge other contributions if they were the second |
|
178 |
reviewer to agree to a change. |
|
179 |
||
180 |
To track the progress of proposed changes, use Bundle Buggy. See |
|
181 |
http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/help for a link to all the |
|
182 |
outstanding merge requests together with an explanation of the columns. |
|
183 |
Bundle Buggy will also mail you a link to track just your change. |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
184 |
|
185 |
||
186 |
Preparing a Sandbox for Making Changes to Bazaar |
|
187 |
================================================ |
|
188 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
189 |
Bazaar supports many ways of organising your work. See |
190 |
http://bazaar-vcs.org/SharedRepositoryLayouts for a summary of the |
|
191 |
popular alternatives. |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
192 |
|
193 |
Of course, the best choice for you will depend on numerous factors: |
|
194 |
the number of changes you may be making, the complexity of the changes, etc. |
|
195 |
As a starting suggestion though: |
|
196 |
||
197 |
* create a local copy of the main development branch (bzr.dev) by using |
|
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
198 |
this command:: |
199 |
||
200 |
bzr branch http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev/ bzr.dev |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
201 |
|
202 |
* keep your copy of bzr.dev prestine (by not developing in it) and keep |
|
203 |
it up to date (by using bzr pull) |
|
204 |
||
205 |
* create a new branch off your local bzr.dev copy for each issue |
|
206 |
(bug or feature) you are working on. |
|
207 |
||
208 |
This approach makes it easy to go back and make any required changes |
|
209 |
after a code review. Resubmitting the change is then simple with no |
|
210 |
risk of accidentially including edits related to other issues you may |
|
211 |
be working on. After the changes for an issue are accepted and merged, |
|
212 |
the associated branch can be deleted or archived as you wish. |
|
213 |
||
214 |
||
215 |
Navigating the Code Base |
|
216 |
======================== |
|
217 |
||
|
3464.3.4
by Martin Pool
Merge part of the NewDeveloperIntroduction into HACKING |
218 |
.. Was at <http://bazaar-vcs.org/NewDeveloperIntroduction> |
219 |
||
220 |
Some of the key files in this directory are: |
|
221 |
||
222 |
bzr |
|
223 |
The command you run to start Bazaar itself. This script is pretty |
|
224 |
short and just does some checks then jumps into bzrlib. |
|
225 |
||
226 |
README |
|
227 |
This file covers a brief introduction to Bazaar and lists some of its |
|
228 |
key features. |
|
229 |
||
230 |
NEWS |
|
231 |
Summary of changes in each Bazaar release that can affect users or |
|
232 |
plugin developers. |
|
233 |
||
234 |
setup.py |
|
235 |
Installs Bazaar system-wide or to your home directory. To perform |
|
236 |
development work on Bazaar it is not required to run this file - you |
|
237 |
can simply run the bzr command from the top level directory of your |
|
238 |
development copy. Note: That if you run setup.py this will create a |
|
239 |
'build' directory in your development branch. There's nothing wrong |
|
240 |
with this but don't be confused by it. The build process puts a copy |
|
241 |
of the main code base into this build directory, along with some other |
|
242 |
files. You don't need to go in here for anything discussed in this |
|
243 |
guide. |
|
244 |
||
245 |
bzrlib |
|
246 |
Possibly the most exciting folder of all, bzrlib holds the main code |
|
247 |
base. This is where you will go to edit python files and contribute to |
|
248 |
Bazaar. |
|
249 |
||
250 |
doc |
|
251 |
Holds documentation on a whole range of things on Bazaar from the |
|
252 |
origination of ideas within the project to information on Bazaar |
|
253 |
features and use cases. Within this directory there is a subdirectory |
|
254 |
for each translation into a human language. All the documentation |
|
255 |
is in the ReStructuredText markup language. |
|
256 |
||
257 |
doc/developers |
|
258 |
Documentation specifically targetted at Bazaar and plugin developers. |
|
259 |
(Including this document.) |
|
260 |
||
261 |
||
262 |
||
263 |
Automatically-generated API reference information is available at |
|
|
3464.3.12
by Martin Pool
Update links to bzrlib api docs |
264 |
<http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/bzrlibapi/>. |
265 |
(There is an experimental editable version at |
|
266 |
<http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/bzrlibapi-oe/>.) |
|
267 |
See also the `Essential Domain Classes`_ |
|
|
3464.3.4
by Martin Pool
Merge part of the NewDeveloperIntroduction into HACKING |
268 |
section of this guide. |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
269 |
|
270 |
||
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
271 |
Testing Bazaar |
272 |
############## |
|
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
273 |
|
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
274 |
The Importance of Testing |
275 |
========================= |
|
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
276 |
|
277 |
Reliability is a critical success factor for any Version Control System. |
|
278 |
We want Bazaar to be highly reliable across multiple platforms while |
|
279 |
evolving over time to meet the needs of its community. |
|
280 |
||
281 |
In a nutshell, this is want we expect and encourage: |
|
282 |
||
283 |
* New functionality should have test cases. Preferably write the |
|
284 |
test before writing the code. |
|
285 |
||
286 |
In general, you can test at either the command-line level or the |
|
|
2466.7.2
by Robert Collins
Document the user of TreeBuilder somewhat. |
287 |
internal API level. See Writing tests below for more detail. |
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
288 |
|
289 |
* Try to practice Test-Driven Development: before fixing a bug, write a |
|
290 |
test case so that it does not regress. Similarly for adding a new |
|
291 |
feature: write a test case for a small version of the new feature before |
|
292 |
starting on the code itself. Check the test fails on the old code, then |
|
293 |
add the feature or fix and check it passes. |
|
294 |
||
295 |
By doing these things, the Bazaar team gets increased confidence that |
|
296 |
changes do what they claim to do, whether provided by the core team or |
|
297 |
by community members. Equally importantly, we can be surer that changes |
|
298 |
down the track do not break new features or bug fixes that you are |
|
299 |
contributing today. |
|
300 |
||
|
3302.11.6
by Vincent Ladeuil
Fixed as per Martin and John reviews. Also fix a bug. |
301 |
As of May 2008, Bazaar ships with a test suite containing over 12000 tests |
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
302 |
and growing. We are proud of it and want to remain so. As community |
303 |
members, we all benefit from it. Would you trust version control on |
|
304 |
your project to a product *without* a test suite like Bazaar has? |
|
305 |
||
306 |
||
307 |
Running the Test Suite |
|
308 |
====================== |
|
309 |
||
310 |
Currently, bzr selftest is used to invoke tests. |
|
311 |
You can provide a pattern argument to run a subset. For example, |
|
312 |
to run just the blackbox tests, run:: |
|
313 |
||
314 |
./bzr selftest -v blackbox |
|
315 |
||
316 |
To skip a particular test (or set of tests), use the --exclude option |
|
317 |
(shorthand -x) like so:: |
|
318 |
||
319 |
./bzr selftest -v -x blackbox |
|
320 |
||
|
2658.3.5
by Daniel Watkins
Added note regarding --strict to HACKING. |
321 |
To ensure that all tests are being run and succeeding, you can use the |
322 |
--strict option which will fail if there are any missing features or known |
|
323 |
failures, like so:: |
|
324 |
||
325 |
./bzr selftest --strict |
|
326 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
327 |
To list tests without running them, use the --list-only option like so:: |
328 |
||
329 |
./bzr selftest --list-only |
|
330 |
||
331 |
This option can be combined with other selftest options (like -x) and |
|
332 |
filter patterns to understand their effect. |
|
333 |
||
|
3302.11.6
by Vincent Ladeuil
Fixed as per Martin and John reviews. Also fix a bug. |
334 |
Once you understand how to create a list of tests, you can use the --load-list |
335 |
option to run only a restricted set of tests that you kept in a file, one test |
|
336 |
id by line. Keep in mind that this will never be sufficient to validate your |
|
337 |
modifications, you still need to run the full test suite for that, but using it |
|
338 |
can help in some cases (like running only the failed tests for some time):: |
|
339 |
||
340 |
./bzr selftest -- load-list my_failing_tests |
|
341 |
||
342 |
This option can also be combined with other selftest options, including |
|
343 |
patterns. It has some drawbacks though, the list can become out of date pretty |
|
344 |
quick when doing Test Driven Development. |
|
345 |
||
346 |
To address this concern, there is another way to run a restricted set of tests: |
|
347 |
the --starting-with option will run only the tests whose name starts with the |
|
348 |
specified string. It will also avoid loading the other tests and as a |
|
349 |
consequence starts running your tests quicker:: |
|
350 |
||
351 |
./bzr selftest --starting-with bzrlib.blackbox |
|
352 |
||
353 |
This option can be combined with all the other selftest options including |
|
354 |
--load-list. The later is rarely used but allows to run a subset of a list of |
|
355 |
failing tests for example. |
|
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
356 |
|
|
3390.1.1
by Andrew Bennetts
Add --debugflags/-E option to selftest. |
357 |
Test suite debug flags |
358 |
---------------------- |
|
359 |
||
360 |
Similar to the global ``-Dfoo`` debug options, bzr selftest accepts |
|
361 |
``-E=foo`` debug flags. These flags are: |
|
362 |
||
363 |
:allow_debug: do *not* clear the global debug flags when running a test. |
|
364 |
This can provide useful logging to help debug test failures when used |
|
365 |
with e.g. ``bzr -Dhpss selftest -E=allow_debug`` |
|
366 |
||
367 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
368 |
Writing Tests |
369 |
============= |
|
370 |
||
371 |
In general tests should be placed in a file named test_FOO.py where |
|
372 |
FOO is the logical thing under test. That file should be placed in the |
|
373 |
tests subdirectory under the package being tested. |
|
374 |
||
375 |
For example, tests for merge3 in bzrlib belong in bzrlib/tests/test_merge3.py. |
|
376 |
See bzrlib/tests/test_sampler.py for a template test script. |
|
377 |
||
378 |
Tests can be written for the UI or for individual areas of the library. |
|
379 |
Choose whichever is appropriate: if adding a new command, or a new command |
|
380 |
option, then you should be writing a UI test. If you are both adding UI |
|
381 |
functionality and library functionality, you will want to write tests for |
|
382 |
both the UI and the core behaviours. We call UI tests 'blackbox' tests |
|
383 |
and they are found in ``bzrlib/tests/blackbox/*.py``. |
|
384 |
||
385 |
When writing blackbox tests please honour the following conventions: |
|
386 |
||
387 |
1. Place the tests for the command 'name' in |
|
388 |
bzrlib/tests/blackbox/test_name.py. This makes it easy for developers |
|
389 |
to locate the test script for a faulty command. |
|
390 |
||
391 |
2. Use the 'self.run_bzr("name")' utility function to invoke the command
|
|
392 |
rather than running bzr in a subprocess or invoking the |
|
393 |
cmd_object.run() method directly. This is a lot faster than |
|
394 |
subprocesses and generates the same logging output as running it in a |
|
395 |
subprocess (which invoking the method directly does not). |
|
396 |
||
397 |
3. Only test the one command in a single test script. Use the bzrlib |
|
398 |
library when setting up tests and when evaluating the side-effects of |
|
399 |
the command. We do this so that the library api has continual pressure |
|
400 |
on it to be as functional as the command line in a simple manner, and |
|
401 |
to isolate knock-on effects throughout the blackbox test suite when a |
|
402 |
command changes its name or signature. Ideally only the tests for a |
|
403 |
given command are affected when a given command is changed. |
|
404 |
||
405 |
4. If you have a test which does actually require running bzr in a |
|
406 |
subprocess you can use ``run_bzr_subprocess``. By default the spawned |
|
407 |
process will not load plugins unless ``--allow-plugins`` is supplied. |
|
408 |
||
|
3567.4.19
by John Arbash Meinel
Add directions to use BranchBuilder for tests. |
409 |
When writing library functionality, it is often necessary to set up a |
410 |
branch with a certain history. Most current tests do this by inheriting |
|
411 |
from ``TestCaseWithTransport`` and using the ``make_branch_and_tree`` |
|
412 |
helper to give them a ``WorkingTree`` that they can commit to. However, |
|
413 |
there is a newer api available from ``TestCaseWithMemoryTransport`` using |
|
414 |
the ``make_branch_builder`` helper. This helper is preferred, because it |
|
415 |
can build the changes in memory, rather than on disk. Tests that are |
|
416 |
explictly testing how we work with disk objects should, of course, use a |
|
417 |
real ``WorkingTree``. See ``bzrlib/branch_builder.py`` for how to use the |
|
418 |
class. |
|
419 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
420 |
|
421 |
Doctests |
|
422 |
-------- |
|
423 |
||
424 |
We make selective use of doctests__. In general they should provide |
|
425 |
*examples* within the API documentation which can incidentally be tested. We |
|
426 |
don't try to test every important case using doctests -- regular Python |
|
427 |
tests are generally a better solution. |
|
428 |
||
429 |
Most of these are in ``bzrlib/doc/api``. More additions are welcome. |
|
430 |
||
431 |
__ http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html |
|
432 |
||
433 |
||
|
2475.2.3
by Martin Pool
Merge ian's HACKING updates |
434 |
Skipping tests and test requirements |
435 |
------------------------------------ |
|
436 |
||
437 |
In our enhancements to unittest we allow for some addition results beyond |
|
438 |
just success or failure. |
|
439 |
||
440 |
If a test can't be run, it can say that it's skipped. This is typically |
|
441 |
used in parameterized tests - for example if a transport doesn't support |
|
442 |
setting permissions, we'll skip the tests that relating to that. :: |
|
443 |
||
444 |
try: |
|
445 |
return self.branch_format.initialize(repo.bzrdir) |
|
446 |
except errors.UninitializableFormat: |
|
447 |
raise tests.TestSkipped('Uninitializable branch format')
|
|
448 |
||
449 |
Raising TestSkipped is a good idea when you want to make it clear that the |
|
450 |
test was not run, rather than just returning which makes it look as if it |
|
451 |
was run and passed. |
|
452 |
||
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
453 |
Several different cases are distinguished: |
454 |
||
455 |
TestSkipped |
|
456 |
Generic skip; the only type that was present up to bzr 0.18. |
|
457 |
||
458 |
TestNotApplicable |
|
459 |
The test doesn't apply to the parameters with which it was run. |
|
460 |
This is typically used when the test is being applied to all |
|
461 |
implementations of an interface, but some aspects of the interface |
|
462 |
are optional and not present in particular concrete |
|
463 |
implementations. (Some tests that should raise this currently |
|
464 |
either silently return or raise TestSkipped.) Another option is |
|
465 |
to use more precise parameterization to avoid generating the test |
|
466 |
at all. |
|
467 |
||
468 |
TestPlatformLimit |
|
469 |
**(Not implemented yet)** |
|
470 |
The test can't be run because of an inherent limitation of the |
|
471 |
environment, such as not having symlinks or not supporting |
|
472 |
unicode. |
|
473 |
||
474 |
UnavailableFeature |
|
475 |
The test can't be run because a dependency (typically a Python |
|
476 |
library) is not available in the test environment. These |
|
477 |
are in general things that the person running the test could fix |
|
478 |
by installing the library. It's OK if some of these occur when |
|
479 |
an end user runs the tests or if we're specifically testing in a |
|
480 |
limited environment, but a full test should never see them. |
|
481 |
||
482 |
KnownFailure |
|
483 |
The test exists but is known to fail, for example because the |
|
484 |
code to fix it hasn't been run yet. Raising this allows |
|
485 |
you to distinguish these failures from the ones that are not |
|
486 |
expected to fail. This could be conditionally raised if something |
|
487 |
is broken on some platforms but not on others. |
|
488 |
||
|
3537.2.1
by Martin Pool
weaves-over-hpss is just not supported, rather than an expected failure |
489 |
If the test would fail because of something we don't expect or |
490 |
intend to fix, KnownFailure is not appropriate, and |
|
491 |
TestNotApplicable might be better. |
|
492 |
||
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
493 |
We plan to support three modes for running the test suite to control the |
494 |
interpretation of these results. Strict mode is for use in situations |
|
495 |
like merges to the mainline and releases where we want to make sure that |
|
496 |
everything that can be tested has been tested. Lax mode is for use by |
|
497 |
developers who want to temporarily tolerate some known failures. The |
|
498 |
default behaviour is obtained by ``bzr selftest`` with no options, and |
|
499 |
also (if possible) by running under another unittest harness. |
|
500 |
||
501 |
======================= ======= ======= ======== |
|
502 |
result strict default lax |
|
503 |
======================= ======= ======= ======== |
|
504 |
TestSkipped pass pass pass |
|
505 |
TestNotApplicable pass pass pass |
|
506 |
TestPlatformLimit pass pass pass |
|
507 |
TestDependencyMissing fail pass pass |
|
|
2729.1.6
by Martin Pool
Update docs to say xfail does not cause overall failure in default test runs, which is true at the moment |
508 |
KnownFailure fail pass pass |
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
509 |
======================= ======= ======= ======== |
510 |
||
511 |
||
512 |
Test feature dependencies |
|
513 |
------------------------- |
|
514 |
||
515 |
Rather than manually checking the environment in each test, a test class |
|
516 |
can declare its dependence on some test features. The feature objects are |
|
517 |
checked only once for each run of the whole test suite. |
|
518 |
||
519 |
For historical reasons, as of May 2007 many cases that should depend on |
|
520 |
features currently raise TestSkipped.) |
|
521 |
||
522 |
:: |
|
|
2475.2.3
by Martin Pool
Merge ian's HACKING updates |
523 |
|
524 |
class TestStrace(TestCaseWithTransport): |
|
525 |
||
526 |
_test_needs_features = [StraceFeature] |
|
527 |
||
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
528 |
This means all tests in this class need the feature. The feature itself |
|
2475.2.3
by Martin Pool
Merge ian's HACKING updates |
529 |
should provide a ``_probe`` method which is called once to determine if |
530 |
it's available. |
|
531 |
||
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
532 |
These should generally be equivalent to either TestDependencyMissing or |
533 |
sometimes TestPlatformLimit. |
|
534 |
||
|
2475.2.3
by Martin Pool
Merge ian's HACKING updates |
535 |
|
536 |
Known failures |
|
537 |
-------------- |
|
538 |
||
539 |
Known failures are when a test exists but we know it currently doesn't |
|
540 |
work, allowing the test suite to still pass. These should be used with |
|
541 |
care, we don't want a proliferation of quietly broken tests. It might be |
|
542 |
appropriate to use them if you've committed a test for a bug but not the |
|
543 |
fix for it, or if something works on Unix but not on Windows. |
|
544 |
||
545 |
||
|
2513.1.9
by Martin Pool
Exception testing review comments |
546 |
Testing exceptions and errors |
547 |
----------------------------- |
|
|
2513.1.8
by Martin Pool
Doc testing of exceptions |
548 |
|
549 |
It's important to test handling of errors and exceptions. Because this |
|
550 |
code is often not hit in ad-hoc testing it can often have hidden bugs -- |
|
551 |
it's particularly common to get NameError because the exception code |
|
552 |
references a variable that has since been renamed. |
|
553 |
||
554 |
.. TODO: Something about how to provoke errors in the right way? |
|
555 |
||
556 |
In general we want to test errors at two levels: |
|
557 |
||
558 |
1. A test in ``test_errors.py`` checking that when the exception object is |
|
559 |
constructed with known parameters it produces an expected string form. |
|
560 |
This guards against mistakes in writing the format string, or in the |
|
561 |
``str`` representations of its parameters. There should be one for |
|
562 |
each exception class. |
|
563 |
||
564 |
2. Tests that when an api is called in a particular situation, it raises |
|
565 |
an error of the expected class. You should typically use |
|
566 |
``assertRaises``, which in the Bazaar test suite returns the exception |
|
567 |
object to allow you to examine its parameters. |
|
568 |
||
569 |
In some cases blackbox tests will also want to check error reporting. But |
|
570 |
it can be difficult to provoke every error through the commandline |
|
571 |
interface, so those tests are only done as needed -- eg in response to a |
|
|
2513.1.9
by Martin Pool
Exception testing review comments |
572 |
particular bug or if the error is reported in an unusual way(?) Blackbox |
573 |
tests should mostly be testing how the command-line interface works, so |
|
574 |
should only test errors if there is something particular to the cli in how |
|
575 |
they're displayed or handled. |
|
|
2513.1.8
by Martin Pool
Doc testing of exceptions |
576 |
|
|
2475.2.3
by Martin Pool
Merge ian's HACKING updates |
577 |
|
|
2592.3.242
by Martin Pool
New method TestCase.call_catch_warnings |
578 |
Testing warnings |
579 |
---------------- |
|
580 |
||
581 |
The Python ``warnings`` module is used to indicate a non-fatal code |
|
582 |
problem. Code that's expected to raise a warning can be tested through |
|
583 |
callCatchWarnings. |
|
584 |
||
585 |
The test suite can be run with ``-Werror`` to check no unexpected errors |
|
586 |
occur. |
|
587 |
||
588 |
However, warnings should be used with discretion. It's not an appropriate |
|
589 |
way to give messages to the user, because the warning is normally shown |
|
590 |
only once per source line that causes the problem. You should also think |
|
591 |
about whether the warning is serious enought that it should be visible to |
|
592 |
users who may not be able to fix it. |
|
593 |
||
594 |
||
|
2729.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add TestNotApplicable exception and handling of it; document test parameterization |
595 |
Interface implementation testing and test scenarios |
596 |
--------------------------------------------------- |
|
597 |
||
598 |
There are several cases in Bazaar of multiple implementations of a common |
|
599 |
conceptual interface. ("Conceptual" because
|
|
600 |
it's not necessary for all the implementations to share a base class, |
|
601 |
though they often do.) Examples include transports and the working tree, |
|
602 |
branch and repository classes. |
|
603 |
||
604 |
In these cases we want to make sure that every implementation correctly |
|
605 |
fulfils the interface requirements. For example, every Transport should |
|
606 |
support the ``has()`` and ``get()`` and ``clone()`` methods. We have a |
|
607 |
sub-suite of tests in ``test_transport_implementations``. (Most |
|
608 |
per-implementation tests are in submodules of ``bzrlib.tests``, but not |
|
609 |
the transport tests at the moment.) |
|
610 |
||
611 |
These tests are repeated for each registered Transport, by generating a |
|
612 |
new TestCase instance for the cross product of test methods and transport |
|
613 |
implementations. As each test runs, it has ``transport_class`` and |
|
614 |
``transport_server`` set to the class it should test. Most tests don't |
|
615 |
access these directly, but rather use ``self.get_transport`` which returns |
|
616 |
a transport of the appropriate type. |
|
617 |
||
618 |
The goal is to run per-implementation only tests that relate to that |
|
619 |
particular interface. Sometimes we discover a bug elsewhere that happens |
|
620 |
with only one particular transport. Once it's isolated, we can consider |
|
621 |
whether a test should be added for that particular implementation, |
|
622 |
or for all implementations of the interface. |
|
623 |
||
624 |
The multiplication of tests for different implementations is normally |
|
625 |
accomplished by overriding the ``test_suite`` function used to load |
|
626 |
tests from a module. This function typically loads all the tests, |
|
627 |
then applies a TestProviderAdapter to them, which generates a longer |
|
628 |
suite containing all the test variations. |
|
629 |
||
630 |
||
|
2729.1.2
by Martin Pool
Add new multiply_tests_from_modules to give a simpler interface to test scenarios |
631 |
Test scenarios |
632 |
-------------- |
|
633 |
||
634 |
Some utilities are provided for generating variations of tests. This can |
|
635 |
be used for per-implementation tests, or other cases where the same test |
|
636 |
code needs to run several times on different scenarios. |
|
637 |
||
638 |
The general approach is to define a class that provides test methods, |
|
639 |
which depend on attributes of the test object being pre-set with the |
|
640 |
values to which the test should be applied. The test suite should then |
|
641 |
also provide a list of scenarios in which to run the tests. |
|
642 |
||
643 |
Typically ``multiply_tests_from_modules`` should be called from the test |
|
644 |
module's ``test_suite`` function. |
|
645 |
||
646 |
||
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
647 |
Essential Domain Classes |
648 |
######################## |
|
649 |
||
650 |
Introducing the Object Model |
|
651 |
============================ |
|
652 |
||
653 |
The core domain objects within the bazaar model are: |
|
654 |
||
655 |
* Transport |
|
656 |
||
657 |
* Branch |
|
658 |
||
659 |
* Repository |
|
660 |
||
661 |
* WorkingTree |
|
662 |
||
663 |
Transports are explained below. See http://bazaar-vcs.org/Classes/ |
|
664 |
for an introduction to the other key classes. |
|
665 |
||
666 |
Using Transports |
|
667 |
================ |
|
668 |
||
669 |
The ``Transport`` layer handles access to local or remote directories. |
|
670 |
Each Transport object acts like a logical connection to a particular |
|
671 |
directory, and it allows various operations on files within it. You can |
|
672 |
*clone* a transport to get a new Transport connected to a subdirectory or |
|
673 |
parent directory. |
|
674 |
||
675 |
Transports are not used for access to the working tree. At present |
|
676 |
working trees are always local and they are accessed through the regular |
|
677 |
Python file io mechanisms. |
|
678 |
||
679 |
Filenames vs URLs |
|
680 |
----------------- |
|
681 |
||
682 |
Transports work in URLs. Take note that URLs are by definition only |
|
683 |
ASCII - the decision of how to encode a Unicode string into a URL must be |
|
684 |
taken at a higher level, typically in the Store. (Note that Stores also |
|
685 |
escape filenames which cannot be safely stored on all filesystems, but |
|
686 |
this is a different level.) |
|
687 |
||
688 |
The main reason for this is that it's not possible to safely roundtrip a |
|
689 |
URL into Unicode and then back into the same URL. The URL standard |
|
690 |
gives a way to represent non-ASCII bytes in ASCII (as %-escapes), but |
|
691 |
doesn't say how those bytes represent non-ASCII characters. (They're not |
|
692 |
guaranteed to be UTF-8 -- that is common but doesn't happen everywhere.) |
|
693 |
||
694 |
For example if the user enters the url ``http://example/%e0`` there's no |
|
695 |
way to tell whether that character represents "latin small letter a with |
|
696 |
grave" in iso-8859-1, or "latin small letter r with acute" in iso-8859-2 |
|
697 |
or malformed UTF-8. So we can't convert their URL to Unicode reliably. |
|
698 |
||
699 |
Equally problematic if we're given a url-like string containing non-ascii |
|
700 |
characters (such as the accented a) we can't be sure how to convert that |
|
701 |
to the correct URL, because we don't know what encoding the server expects |
|
702 |
for those characters. (Although this is not totally reliable we might still |
|
703 |
accept these and assume they should be put into UTF-8.) |
|
704 |
||
705 |
A similar edge case is that the url ``http://foo/sweet%2Fsour`` contains |
|
706 |
one directory component whose name is "sweet/sour". The escaped slash is |
|
707 |
not a directory separator. If we try to convert URLs to regular Unicode |
|
708 |
paths this information will be lost. |
|
709 |
||
710 |
This implies that Transports must natively deal with URLs; for simplicity |
|
711 |
they *only* deal with URLs and conversion of other strings to URLs is done |
|
712 |
elsewhere. Information they return, such as from ``list_dir``, is also in |
|
713 |
the form of URL components. |
|
714 |
||
715 |
||
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
716 |
Coding Style Guidelines |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
717 |
####################### |
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
718 |
|
|
3376.2.2
by Martin Pool
Add documentation of assert statement ban |
719 |
hasattr and getattr |
|
3408.1.8
by Martin Pool
merge trunk |
720 |
=================== |
|
2974.1.1
by Martin Pool
HACKING: say not to use hasattr() |
721 |
|
722 |
``hasattr`` should not be used because it swallows exceptions including |
|
723 |
``KeyboardInterrupt``. Instead, say something like :: |
|
724 |
||
725 |
if getattr(thing, 'name', None) is None |
|
726 |
||
727 |
||
|
2795.1.1
by Martin Pool
Document code layout stuff |
728 |
Code layout |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
729 |
=========== |
|
2795.1.1
by Martin Pool
Document code layout stuff |
730 |
|
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
731 |
Please write PEP-8__ compliant code. |
732 |
||
|
2795.1.1
by Martin Pool
Document code layout stuff |
733 |
__ http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html |
734 |
||
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
735 |
One often-missed requirement is that the first line of docstrings |
736 |
should be a self-contained one-sentence summary. |
|
737 |
||
|
2795.1.1
by Martin Pool
Document code layout stuff |
738 |
We use 4 space indents for blocks, and never use tab characters. (In vim, |
739 |
``set expandtab``.) |
|
740 |
||
741 |
Lines should be no more than 79 characters if at all possible. |
|
742 |
Lines that continue a long statement may be indented in either of |
|
743 |
two ways: |
|
744 |
||
745 |
within the parenthesis or other character that opens the block, e.g.:: |
|
746 |
||
747 |
my_long_method(arg1, |
|
748 |
arg2, |
|
749 |
arg3) |
|
750 |
||
751 |
or indented by four spaces:: |
|
752 |
||
753 |
my_long_method(arg1, |
|
754 |
arg2, |
|
755 |
arg3) |
|
756 |
||
757 |
The first is considered clearer by some people; however it can be a bit |
|
758 |
harder to maintain (e.g. when the method name changes), and it does not |
|
759 |
work well if the relevant parenthesis is already far to the right. Avoid |
|
760 |
this:: |
|
761 |
||
762 |
self.legbone.kneebone.shinbone.toebone.shake_it(one, |
|
763 |
two, |
|
764 |
three) |
|
765 |
||
766 |
but rather :: |
|
767 |
||
768 |
self.legbone.kneebone.shinbone.toebone.shake_it(one, |
|
769 |
two, |
|
770 |
three) |
|
771 |
||
772 |
or :: |
|
773 |
||
774 |
self.legbone.kneebone.shinbone.toebone.shake_it( |
|
775 |
one, two, three) |
|
776 |
||
777 |
For long lists, we like to add a trailing comma and put the closing |
|
778 |
character on the following line. This makes it easier to add new items in |
|
779 |
future:: |
|
780 |
||
781 |
from bzrlib.goo import ( |
|
782 |
jam, |
|
783 |
jelly, |
|
784 |
marmalade, |
|
785 |
) |
|
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
786 |
|
|
2795.1.3
by Martin Pool
clarify spacing for function parameters |
787 |
There should be spaces between function paramaters, but not between the |
788 |
keyword name and the value:: |
|
789 |
||
790 |
call(1, 3, cheese=quark) |
|
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
791 |
|
|
2795.1.2
by Martin Pool
emacs indent additions from vila |
792 |
In emacs:: |
793 |
||
794 |
;(defface my-invalid-face |
|
795 |
; '((t (:background "Red" :underline t))) |
|
796 |
; "Face used to highlight invalid constructs or other uglyties" |
|
797 |
; ) |
|
798 |
||
799 |
(defun my-python-mode-hook () |
|
800 |
;; setup preferred indentation style. |
|
801 |
(setq fill-column 79) |
|
802 |
(setq indent-tabs-mode nil) ; no tabs, never, I will not repeat |
|
803 |
; (font-lock-add-keywords 'python-mode |
|
804 |
; '(("^\\s *\t" . 'my-invalid-face) ; Leading tabs
|
|
805 |
; ("[ \t]+$" . 'my-invalid-face) ; Trailing spaces
|
|
806 |
; ("^[ \t]+$" . 'my-invalid-face)); Spaces only
|
|
807 |
; ) |
|
808 |
) |
|
809 |
||
810 |
(add-hook 'python-mode-hook 'my-python-mode-hook) |
|
811 |
||
812 |
The lines beginning with ';' are comments. They can be activated |
|
813 |
if one want to have a strong notice of some tab/space usage |
|
814 |
violations. |
|
815 |
||
816 |
||
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
817 |
Module Imports |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
818 |
============== |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
819 |
|
820 |
* Imports should be done at the top-level of the file, unless there is |
|
821 |
a strong reason to have them lazily loaded when a particular |
|
822 |
function runs. Import statements have a cost, so try to make sure |
|
823 |
they don't run inside hot functions. |
|
824 |
||
825 |
* Module names should always be given fully-qualified, |
|
826 |
i.e. ``bzrlib.hashcache`` not just ``hashcache``. |
|
827 |
||
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
828 |
|
829 |
Naming |
|
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
830 |
====== |
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
831 |
|
|
2625.3.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Clarify the use of underscore in the naming convention |
832 |
Functions, methods or members that are "private" to bzrlib are given |
833 |
a leading underscore prefix. Names without a leading underscore are |
|
834 |
public not just across modules but to programmers using bzrlib as an |
|
835 |
API. As a consequence, a leading underscore is appropriate for names |
|
836 |
exposed across modules but that are not to be exposed to bzrlib API |
|
837 |
programmers. |
|
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
838 |
|
839 |
We prefer class names to be concatenated capital words (``TestCase``) |
|
840 |
and variables, methods and functions to be lowercase words joined by |
|
841 |
underscores (``revision_id``, ``get_revision``). |
|
842 |
||
843 |
For the purposes of naming some names are treated as single compound |
|
844 |
words: "filename", "revno". |
|
845 |
||
846 |
Consider naming classes as nouns and functions/methods as verbs. |
|
847 |
||
|
2221.4.7
by Aaron Bentley
Add suggestion to HACKING |
848 |
Try to avoid using abbreviations in names, because there can be |
849 |
inconsistency if other people use the full name. |
|
850 |
||
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
851 |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
852 |
Standard Names |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
853 |
============== |
|
1393.1.53
by Martin Pool
- notes from coding-convention discussion |
854 |
|
855 |
``revision_id`` not ``rev_id`` or ``revid`` |
|
856 |
||
857 |
Functions that transform one thing to another should be named ``x_to_y`` |
|
858 |
(not ``x2y`` as occurs in some old code.) |
|
859 |
||
|
1098
by Martin Pool
- notes on how output is written |
860 |
|
|
1185.16.85
by mbp at sourcefrog
- rules for using destructors |
861 |
Destructors |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
862 |
=========== |
|
1185.16.85
by mbp at sourcefrog
- rules for using destructors |
863 |
|
|
1185.16.150
by Martin Pool
Improved description of python exception policies |
864 |
Python destructors (``__del__``) work differently to those of other |
865 |
languages. In particular, bear in mind that destructors may be called |
|
866 |
immediately when the object apparently becomes unreferenced, or at some |
|
867 |
later time, or possibly never at all. Therefore we have restrictions on |
|
868 |
what can be done inside them. |
|
|
1185.16.85
by mbp at sourcefrog
- rules for using destructors |
869 |
|
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
870 |
0. If you think you need to use a ``__del__`` method ask another |
871 |
developer for alternatives. If you do need to use one, explain |
|
872 |
why in a comment. |
|
|
1185.16.85
by mbp at sourcefrog
- rules for using destructors |
873 |
|
874 |
1. Never rely on a ``__del__`` method running. If there is code that |
|
875 |
must run, do it from a ``finally`` block instead. |
|
876 |
||
877 |
2. Never ``import`` from inside a ``__del__`` method, or you may crash the |
|
878 |
interpreter!! |
|
879 |
||
880 |
3. In some places we raise a warning from the destructor if the object |
|
881 |
has not been cleaned up or closed. This is considered OK: the warning |
|
882 |
may not catch every case but it's still useful sometimes. |
|
883 |
||
884 |
||
|
1740.2.5
by Aaron Bentley
Merge from bzr.dev |
885 |
Factories |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
886 |
========= |
|
1740.2.5
by Aaron Bentley
Merge from bzr.dev |
887 |
|
888 |
In some places we have variables which point to callables that construct |
|
889 |
new instances. That is to say, they can be used a lot like class objects, |
|
890 |
but they shouldn't be *named* like classes: |
|
891 |
||
892 |
> I think that things named FooBar should create instances of FooBar when |
|
893 |
> called. Its plain confusing for them to do otherwise. When we have |
|
894 |
> something that is going to be used as a class - that is, checked for via |
|
895 |
> isinstance or other such idioms, them I would call it foo_class, so that |
|
896 |
> it is clear that a callable is not sufficient. If it is only used as a |
|
897 |
> factory, then yes, foo_factory is what I would use. |
|
898 |
||
899 |
||
|
1911.4.15
by John Arbash Meinel
Updated HACKING and docstrings per Martin's suggestions |
900 |
Registries |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
901 |
========== |
|
1911.4.15
by John Arbash Meinel
Updated HACKING and docstrings per Martin's suggestions |
902 |
|
903 |
Several places in Bazaar use (or will use) a registry, which is a |
|
904 |
mapping from names to objects or classes. The registry allows for |
|
905 |
loading in registered code only when it's needed, and keeping |
|
906 |
associated information such as a help string or description. |
|
907 |
||
908 |
||
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
909 |
Lazy Imports |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
910 |
============ |
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
911 |
|
912 |
To make startup time faster, we use the ``bzrlib.lazy_import`` module to |
|
913 |
delay importing modules until they are actually used. ``lazy_import`` uses |
|
914 |
the same syntax as regular python imports. So to import a few modules in a |
|
915 |
lazy fashion do:: |
|
916 |
||
917 |
from bzrlib.lazy_import import lazy_import |
|
918 |
lazy_import(globals(), """ |
|
919 |
import os |
|
920 |
import subprocess |
|
921 |
import sys |
|
922 |
import time |
|
923 |
||
924 |
from bzrlib import ( |
|
925 |
errors, |
|
926 |
transport, |
|
|
1996.3.37
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING and TODO |
927 |
revision as _mod_revision, |
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
928 |
) |
929 |
import bzrlib.transport |
|
930 |
import bzrlib.xml5 |
|
931 |
""") |
|
932 |
||
933 |
At this point, all of these exist as a ``ImportReplacer`` object, ready to |
|
|
1996.3.37
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING and TODO |
934 |
be imported once a member is accessed. Also, when importing a module into |
935 |
the local namespace, which is likely to clash with variable names, it is |
|
|
2370.1.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Minor corrections to HACKING |
936 |
recommended to prefix it as ``_mod_<module>``. This makes it clearer that |
|
1996.3.37
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING and TODO |
937 |
the variable is a module, and these object should be hidden anyway, since |
938 |
they shouldn't be imported into other namespaces. |
|
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
939 |
|
940 |
While it is possible for ``lazy_import()`` to import members of a module |
|
|
2063.3.1
by wang
fix typos |
941 |
when using the ``from module import member`` syntax, it is recommended to |
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
942 |
only use that syntax to load sub modules ``from module import submodule``. |
943 |
This is because variables and classes can frequently be used without |
|
944 |
needing a sub-member for example:: |
|
945 |
||
946 |
lazy_import(globals(), """ |
|
947 |
from module import MyClass |
|
948 |
""") |
|
949 |
||
950 |
def test(x): |
|
951 |
return isinstance(x, MyClass) |
|
952 |
||
953 |
This will incorrectly fail, because ``MyClass`` is a ``ImportReplacer`` |
|
954 |
object, rather than the real class. |
|
955 |
||
|
1996.1.26
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING and docstrings |
956 |
It also is incorrect to assign ``ImportReplacer`` objects to other variables. |
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
957 |
Because the replacer only knows about the original name, it is unable to |
958 |
replace other variables. The ``ImportReplacer`` class will raise an |
|
|
1996.1.26
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING and docstrings |
959 |
``IllegalUseOfScopeReplacer`` exception if it can figure out that this |
960 |
happened. But it requires accessing a member more than once from the new |
|
961 |
variable, so some bugs are not detected right away. |
|
|
1996.1.20
by John Arbash Meinel
HACKING and NEWS |
962 |
|
963 |
||
|
2598.5.9
by Aaron Bentley
Update NEWS and HACKING |
964 |
The Null revision |
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
965 |
================= |
|
2598.5.9
by Aaron Bentley
Update NEWS and HACKING |
966 |
|
967 |
The null revision is the ancestor of all revisions. Its revno is 0, its |
|
968 |
revision-id is ``null:``, and its tree is the empty tree. When referring |
|
969 |
to the null revision, please use ``bzrlib.revision.NULL_REVISION``. Old |
|
970 |
code sometimes uses ``None`` for the null revision, but this practice is |
|
971 |
being phased out. |
|
972 |
||
973 |
||
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
974 |
Object string representations |
975 |
============================= |
|
976 |
||
977 |
Python prints objects using their ``__repr__`` method when they are |
|
978 |
written to logs, exception tracebacks, or the debugger. We want |
|
979 |
objects to have useful representations to help in determining what went |
|
980 |
wrong. |
|
981 |
||
982 |
If you add a new class you should generally add a ``__repr__`` method |
|
983 |
unless there is an adequate method in a parent class. There should be a |
|
984 |
test for the repr. |
|
985 |
||
986 |
Representations should typically look like Python constructor syntax, but |
|
987 |
they don't need to include every value in the object and they don't need |
|
988 |
to be able to actually execute. They're to be read by humans, not |
|
989 |
machines. Don't hardcode the classname in the format, so that we get the |
|
990 |
correct value if the method is inherited by a subclass. If you're |
|
991 |
printing attributes of the object, including strings, you should normally |
|
992 |
use ``%r`` syntax (to call their repr in turn). |
|
993 |
||
|
3408.1.10
by Martin Pool
Review feedback |
994 |
Try to avoid the representation becoming more than one or two lines long. |
995 |
(But balance this against including useful information, and simplicity of |
|
996 |
implementation.) |
|
997 |
||
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
998 |
Because repr methods are often called when something has already gone |
|
3464.3.10
by Martin Pool
Remove example of catching all exceptions from __repr__ in HACKING |
999 |
wrong, they should be written somewhat more defensively than most code. |
1000 |
The object may be half-initialized or in some other way in an illegal |
|
1001 |
state. The repr method shouldn't raise an exception, or it may hide the |
|
1002 |
(probably more useful) underlying exception. |
|
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
1003 |
|
1004 |
Example:: |
|
1005 |
||
1006 |
def __repr__(self): |
|
|
3464.3.10
by Martin Pool
Remove example of catching all exceptions from __repr__ in HACKING |
1007 |
return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, |
1008 |
self._transport) |
|
|
3408.1.5
by Martin Pool
Coding standard: repr methods |
1009 |
|
1010 |
||
|
3464.3.11
by Martin Pool
Add developer advice against bare except: |
1011 |
Exception handling |
1012 |
================== |
|
1013 |
||
1014 |
A bare ``except`` statement will catch all exceptions, including ones that |
|
1015 |
really should terminate the program such as ``MemoryError`` and |
|
1016 |
``KeyboardInterrupt``. They should rarely be used unless the exception is |
|
1017 |
later re-raised. Even then, think about whether catching just |
|
1018 |
``Exception`` (which excludes system errors in Python2.5 and later) would |
|
1019 |
be better. |
|
1020 |
||
1021 |
||
1022 |
||
|
3408.1.7
by Martin Pool
Move coding standards to be a top-level section in the developer guide |
1023 |
Core Topics |
1024 |
########### |
|
1025 |
||
1026 |
Evolving Interfaces |
|
1027 |
=================== |
|
1028 |
||
1029 |
We have a commitment to 6 months API stability - any supported symbol in a |
|
1030 |
release of bzr MUST NOT be altered in any way that would result in |
|
1031 |
breaking existing code that uses it. That means that method names, |
|
1032 |
parameter ordering, parameter names, variable and attribute names etc must |
|
1033 |
not be changed without leaving a 'deprecated forwarder' behind. This even |
|
1034 |
applies to modules and classes. |
|
1035 |
||
1036 |
If you wish to change the behaviour of a supported API in an incompatible |
|
1037 |
way, you need to change its name as well. For instance, if I add an optional keyword |
|
1038 |
parameter to branch.commit - that's fine. On the other hand, if I add a |
|
1039 |
keyword parameter to branch.commit which is a *required* transaction |
|
1040 |
object, I should rename the API - i.e. to 'branch.commit_transaction'. |
|
1041 |
||
1042 |
When renaming such supported API's, be sure to leave a deprecated_method (or |
|
1043 |
_function or ...) behind which forwards to the new API. See the |
|
1044 |
bzrlib.symbol_versioning module for decorators that take care of the |
|
1045 |
details for you - such as updating the docstring, and issuing a warning |
|
1046 |
when the old api is used. |
|
1047 |
||
1048 |
For unsupported API's, it does not hurt to follow this discipline, but it's |
|
1049 |
not required. Minimally though, please try to rename things so that |
|
1050 |
callers will at least get an AttributeError rather than weird results. |
|
1051 |
||
1052 |
||
1053 |
Deprecation decorators |
|
1054 |
---------------------- |
|
1055 |
||
1056 |
``bzrlib.symbol_versioning`` provides decorators that can be attached to |
|
1057 |
methods, functions, and other interfaces to indicate that they should no |
|
|
3408.1.9
by Martin Pool
Use new-style deprecated_in |
1058 |
longer be used. For example:: |
1059 |
||
1060 |
@deprecated_method(deprecated_in((0, 1, 4))) |
|
1061 |
def foo(self): |
|
1062 |
return self._new_foo() |
|
|
3408.1.7
by Martin Pool
Move coding standards to be a top-level section in the developer guide |
1063 |
|
1064 |
To deprecate a static method you must call ``deprecated_function`` |
|
1065 |
(**not** method), after the staticmethod call:: |
|
1066 |
||
1067 |
@staticmethod |
|
|
3408.1.9
by Martin Pool
Use new-style deprecated_in |
1068 |
@deprecated_function(deprecated_in((0, 1, 4))) |
|
3408.1.7
by Martin Pool
Move coding standards to be a top-level section in the developer guide |
1069 |
def create_repository(base, shared=False, format=None): |
1070 |
||
1071 |
When you deprecate an API, you should not just delete its tests, because |
|
1072 |
then we might introduce bugs in them. If the API is still present at all, |
|
1073 |
it should still work. The basic approach is to use |
|
1074 |
``TestCase.applyDeprecated`` which in one step checks that the API gives |
|
1075 |
the expected deprecation message, and also returns the real result from |
|
1076 |
the method, so that tests can keep running. |
|
1077 |
||
|
3427.5.9
by John Arbash Meinel
merge bzr.dev, move update to new location in HACKING |
1078 |
Deprecation warnings will be suppressed for final releases, but not for |
1079 |
development versions or release candidates, or when running ``bzr |
|
1080 |
selftest``. This gives developers information about whether their code is |
|
1081 |
using deprecated functions, but avoids confusing users about things they |
|
1082 |
can't fix. |
|
1083 |
||
|
3408.1.7
by Martin Pool
Move coding standards to be a top-level section in the developer guide |
1084 |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1085 |
Getting Input |
1086 |
============= |
|
1087 |
||
1088 |
Processing Command Lines |
|
1089 |
------------------------ |
|
1090 |
||
1091 |
bzrlib has a standard framework for parsing command lines and calling |
|
1092 |
processing routines associated with various commands. See builtins.py |
|
|
2466.6.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from LarstiQ |
1093 |
for numerous examples. |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1094 |
|
1095 |
||
1096 |
Standard Parameter Types |
|
1097 |
------------------------ |
|
1098 |
||
1099 |
There are some common requirements in the library: some parameters need to be |
|
1100 |
unicode safe, some need byte strings, and so on. At the moment we have |
|
1101 |
only codified one specific pattern: Parameters that need to be unicode |
|
1102 |
should be checked via ``bzrlib.osutils.safe_unicode``. This will coerce the |
|
1103 |
input into unicode in a consistent fashion, allowing trivial strings to be |
|
1104 |
used for programmer convenience, but not performing unpredictably in the |
|
1105 |
presence of different locales. |
|
1106 |
||
1107 |
||
1108 |
Writing Output |
|
|
1098
by Martin Pool
- notes on how output is written |
1109 |
============== |
1110 |
||
1111 |
(The strategy described here is what we want to get to, but it's not |
|
1112 |
consistently followed in the code at the moment.) |
|
1113 |
||
1114 |
bzrlib is intended to be a generically reusable library. It shouldn't |
|
1115 |
write messages to stdout or stderr, because some programs that use it |
|
1116 |
might want to display that information through a GUI or some other |
|
1117 |
mechanism. |
|
1118 |
||
1119 |
We can distinguish two types of output from the library: |
|
1120 |
||
1121 |
1. Structured data representing the progress or result of an |
|
1122 |
operation. For example, for a commit command this will be a list |
|
1123 |
of the modified files and the finally committed revision number |
|
1124 |
and id. |
|
1125 |
||
1126 |
These should be exposed either through the return code or by calls |
|
1127 |
to a callback parameter. |
|
1128 |
||
1129 |
A special case of this is progress indicators for long-lived |
|
1130 |
operations, where the caller should pass a ProgressBar object. |
|
1131 |
||
1132 |
2. Unstructured log/debug messages, mostly for the benefit of the |
|
1133 |
developers or users trying to debug problems. This should always |
|
1134 |
be sent through ``bzrlib.trace`` and Python ``logging``, so that |
|
1135 |
it can be redirected by the client. |
|
1136 |
||
1137 |
The distinction between the two is a bit subjective, but in general if |
|
1138 |
there is any chance that a library would want to see something as |
|
1139 |
structured data, we should make it so. |
|
1140 |
||
1141 |
The policy about how output is presented in the text-mode client |
|
1142 |
should be only in the command-line tool. |
|
|
1092.1.22
by Robert Collins
update hacking with some test foo |
1143 |
|
|
1418
by Robert Collins
merge martins latest |
1144 |
|
|
2598.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add test for and documentation of option style, fix up existing options to comply |
1145 |
|
1146 |
Displaying help |
|
1147 |
=============== |
|
1148 |
||
1149 |
Bazaar has online help for various topics through ``bzr help COMMAND`` or |
|
1150 |
equivalently ``bzr command -h``. We also have help on command options, |
|
1151 |
and on other help topics. (See ``help_topics.py``.) |
|
1152 |
||
1153 |
As for python docstrings, the first paragraph should be a single-sentence |
|
1154 |
synopsis of the command. |
|
1155 |
||
1156 |
The help for options should be one or more proper sentences, starting with |
|
1157 |
a capital letter and finishing with a full stop (period). |
|
1158 |
||
1159 |
All help messages and documentation should have two spaces between |
|
1160 |
sentences. |
|
1161 |
||
1162 |
||
|
1092.1.22
by Robert Collins
update hacking with some test foo |
1163 |
Writing tests |
1164 |
============= |
|
|
2067.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Review comments from Robert |
1165 |
|
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1166 |
In general tests should be placed in a file named test_FOO.py where |
|
1092.1.22
by Robert Collins
update hacking with some test foo |
1167 |
FOO is the logical thing under test. That file should be placed in the |
1168 |
tests subdirectory under the package being tested. |
|
1169 |
||
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1170 |
For example, tests for merge3 in bzrlib belong in bzrlib/tests/test_merge3.py. |
|
2370.1.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Minor corrections to HACKING |
1171 |
See bzrlib/tests/test_sampler.py for a template test script. |
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1172 |
|
1173 |
Tests can be written for the UI or for individual areas of the library. |
|
1174 |
Choose whichever is appropriate: if adding a new command, or a new command |
|
1175 |
option, then you should be writing a UI test. If you are both adding UI |
|
1176 |
functionality and library functionality, you will want to write tests for |
|
1177 |
both the UI and the core behaviours. We call UI tests 'blackbox' tests |
|
|
1711.2.94
by John Arbash Meinel
Update HACKING to be rst compliant |
1178 |
and they are found in ``bzrlib/tests/blackbox/*.py``. |
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1179 |
|
1180 |
When writing blackbox tests please honour the following conventions: |
|
1181 |
||
1182 |
1. Place the tests for the command 'name' in |
|
1183 |
bzrlib/tests/blackbox/test_name.py. This makes it easy for developers |
|
1184 |
to locate the test script for a faulty command. |
|
1185 |
||
1186 |
2. Use the 'self.run_bzr("name")' utility function to invoke the command
|
|
1187 |
rather than running bzr in a subprocess or invoking the |
|
1188 |
cmd_object.run() method directly. This is a lot faster than |
|
1189 |
subprocesses and generates the same logging output as running it in a |
|
1190 |
subprocess (which invoking the method directly does not). |
|
1191 |
||
1192 |
3. Only test the one command in a single test script. Use the bzrlib |
|
1193 |
library when setting up tests and when evaluating the side-effects of |
|
1194 |
the command. We do this so that the library api has continual pressure |
|
1195 |
on it to be as functional as the command line in a simple manner, and |
|
1196 |
to isolate knock-on effects throughout the blackbox test suite when a |
|
|
2063.3.1
by wang
fix typos |
1197 |
command changes its name or signature. Ideally only the tests for a |
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1198 |
given command are affected when a given command is changed. |
|
1393.1.61
by Martin Pool
doc |
1199 |
|
|
2067.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Review comments from Robert |
1200 |
4. If you have a test which does actually require running bzr in a |
1201 |
subprocess you can use ``run_bzr_subprocess``. By default the spawned |
|
1202 |
process will not load plugins unless ``--allow-plugins`` is supplied. |
|
1203 |
||
1204 |
||
|
2466.7.2
by Robert Collins
Document the user of TreeBuilder somewhat. |
1205 |
Test support |
1206 |
------------ |
|
1207 |
||
1208 |
We have a rich collection of tools to support writing tests. Please use |
|
1209 |
them in preference to ad-hoc solutions as they provide portability and |
|
1210 |
performance benefits. |
|
1211 |
||
1212 |
TreeBuilder |
|
1213 |
~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
1214 |
||
1215 |
The ``TreeBuilder`` interface allows the construction of arbitrary trees |
|
1216 |
with a declarative interface. A sample session might look like:: |
|
1217 |
||
1218 |
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('path')
|
|
1219 |
builder = TreeBuilder() |
|
1220 |
builder.start_tree(tree) |
|
1221 |
builder.build(['foo', "bar/", "bar/file"]) |
|
1222 |
tree.commit('commit the tree')
|
|
1223 |
builder.finish_tree() |
|
1224 |
||
1225 |
Please see bzrlib.treebuilder for more details. |
|
1226 |
||
|
2466.7.7
by Robert Collins
Document basic usage. |
1227 |
BranchBuilder |
1228 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
1229 |
||
1230 |
The ``BranchBuilder`` interface allows the creation of test branches in a |
|
1231 |
quick and easy manner. A sample session:: |
|
1232 |
||
1233 |
builder = BranchBuilder(self.get_transport().clone('relpath'))
|
|
1234 |
builder.build_commit() |
|
1235 |
builder.build_commit() |
|
1236 |
builder.build_commit() |
|
1237 |
branch = builder.get_branch() |
|
1238 |
||
1239 |
Please see bzrlib.branchbuilder for more details. |
|
|
2466.7.2
by Robert Collins
Document the user of TreeBuilder somewhat. |
1240 |
|
|
1740.6.1
by Martin Pool
Remove Scratch objects used by doctests |
1241 |
Doctests |
1242 |
-------- |
|
1243 |
||
1244 |
We make selective use of doctests__. In general they should provide |
|
1245 |
*examples* within the API documentation which can incidentally be tested. We |
|
1246 |
don't try to test every important case using doctests -- regular Python |
|
1247 |
tests are generally a better solution. |
|
1248 |
||
1249 |
Most of these are in ``bzrlib/doc/api``. More additions are welcome. |
|
1250 |
||
1251 |
__ http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html |
|
1252 |
||
1253 |
||
|
1092.1.22
by Robert Collins
update hacking with some test foo |
1254 |
Running tests |
1255 |
============= |
|
1256 |
Currently, bzr selftest is used to invoke tests. |
|
1257 |
You can provide a pattern argument to run a subset. For example, |
|
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1258 |
to run just the blackbox tests, run:: |
|
1393.1.61
by Martin Pool
doc |
1259 |
|
|
1638.1.1
by Robert Collins
Update HACKING to reflect current test writing policy. |
1260 |
./bzr selftest -v blackbox |
|
1393.1.61
by Martin Pool
doc |
1261 |
|
|
2394.2.6
by Ian Clatworthy
completed blackbox tests |
1262 |
To skip a particular test (or set of tests), use the --exclude option |
1263 |
(shorthand -x) like so:: |
|
1264 |
||
1265 |
./bzr selftest -v -x blackbox |
|
1266 |
||
1267 |
To list tests without running them, use the --list-only option like so:: |
|
1268 |
||
1269 |
./bzr selftest --list-only |
|
1270 |
||
1271 |
This option can be combined with other selftest options (like -x) and |
|
1272 |
filter patterns to understand their effect. |
|
|
1551.6.41
by Aaron Bentley
Add advice on skipping tests to HACKING |
1273 |
|
|
1393.1.61
by Martin Pool
doc |
1274 |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1275 |
Handling Errors and Exceptions |
1276 |
============================== |
|
1277 |
||
1278 |
Commands should return non-zero when they encounter circumstances that |
|
1279 |
the user should really pay attention to - which includes trivial shell |
|
1280 |
pipelines. |
|
1281 |
||
1282 |
Recommended values are: |
|
1283 |
||
1284 |
0. OK. |
|
1285 |
1. Conflicts in merge-like operations, or changes are present in |
|
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
1286 |
diff-like operations. |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1287 |
2. Unrepresentable diff changes (i.e. binary files that we cannot show |
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
1288 |
a diff of). |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1289 |
3. An error or exception has occurred. |
|
2713.2.2
by Martin Pool
Add mention of exitcode 4 for internal errors |
1290 |
4. An internal error occurred (one that shows a traceback.) |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1291 |
|
1292 |
Errors are handled through Python exceptions. Exceptions should be defined |
|
1293 |
inside bzrlib.errors, so that we can see the whole tree at a glance. |
|
1294 |
||
1295 |
We broadly classify errors as either being either internal or not, |
|
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
1296 |
depending on whether ``internal_error`` is set or not. If we think it's our |
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1297 |
fault, we show a backtrace, an invitation to report the bug, and possibly |
1298 |
other details. This is the default for errors that aren't specifically |
|
1299 |
recognized as being caused by a user error. Otherwise we show a briefer |
|
1300 |
message, unless -Derror was given. |
|
1301 |
||
1302 |
Many errors originate as "environmental errors" which are raised by Python |
|
1303 |
or builtin libraries -- for example IOError. These are treated as being |
|
1304 |
our fault, unless they're caught in a particular tight scope where we know |
|
1305 |
that they indicate a user errors. For example if the repository format |
|
1306 |
is not found, the user probably gave the wrong path or URL. But if one of |
|
1307 |
the files inside the repository is not found, then it's our fault -- |
|
1308 |
either there's a bug in bzr, or something complicated has gone wrong in |
|
1309 |
the environment that means one internal file was deleted. |
|
1310 |
||
1311 |
Many errors are defined in ``bzrlib/errors.py`` but it's OK for new errors |
|
1312 |
to be added near the place where they are used. |
|
1313 |
||
1314 |
Exceptions are formatted for the user by conversion to a string |
|
1315 |
(eventually calling their ``__str__`` method.) As a convenience the |
|
1316 |
``._fmt`` member can be used as a template which will be mapped to the |
|
1317 |
error's instance dict. |
|
1318 |
||
1319 |
New exception classes should be defined when callers might want to catch |
|
1320 |
that exception specifically, or when it needs a substantially different |
|
1321 |
format string. |
|
1322 |
||
1323 |
Exception strings should start with a capital letter and should not have a |
|
1324 |
final fullstop. If long, they may contain newlines to break the text. |
|
1325 |
||
1326 |
||
|
3376.2.3
by Martin Pool
Updated info about assertions |
1327 |
Assertions |
|
3408.1.8
by Martin Pool
merge trunk |
1328 |
========== |
|
3376.2.3
by Martin Pool
Updated info about assertions |
1329 |
|
1330 |
Do not use the Python ``assert`` statement, either in tests or elsewhere. |
|
1331 |
A source test checks that it is not used. It is ok to explicitly raise |
|
1332 |
AssertionError. |
|
1333 |
||
1334 |
Rationale: |
|
1335 |
||
1336 |
* It makes the behaviour vary depending on whether bzr is run with -O |
|
1337 |
or not, therefore giving a chance for bugs that occur in one case or |
|
1338 |
the other, several of which have already occurred: assertions with |
|
1339 |
side effects, code which can't continue unless the assertion passes, |
|
1340 |
cases where we should give the user a proper message rather than an |
|
1341 |
assertion failure. |
|
1342 |
* It's not that much shorter than an explicit if/raise. |
|
1343 |
* It tends to lead to fuzzy thinking about whether the check is |
|
1344 |
actually needed or not, and whether it's an internal error or not |
|
1345 |
* It tends to cause look-before-you-leap patterns. |
|
1346 |
* It's unsafe if the check is needed to protect the integrity of the |
|
1347 |
user's data. |
|
1348 |
* It tends to give poor messages since the developer can get by with |
|
1349 |
no explanatory text at all. |
|
1350 |
* We can't rely on people always running with -O in normal use, so we |
|
1351 |
can't use it for tests that are actually expensive. |
|
1352 |
* Expensive checks that help developers are better turned on from the |
|
1353 |
test suite or a -D flag. |
|
1354 |
* If used instead of ``self.assert*()`` in tests it makes them falsely pass with -O. |
|
1355 |
||
1356 |
||
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1357 |
Documenting Changes |
1358 |
=================== |
|
1359 |
||
1360 |
When you change bzrlib, please update the relevant documentation for the |
|
1361 |
change you made: Changes to commands should update their help, and |
|
1362 |
possibly end user tutorials; changes to the core library should be |
|
1363 |
reflected in API documentation. |
|
1364 |
||
1365 |
NEWS File |
|
1366 |
--------- |
|
1367 |
||
1368 |
If you make a user-visible change, please add a note to the NEWS file. |
|
1369 |
The description should be written to make sense to someone who's just |
|
1370 |
a user of bzr, not a developer: new functions or classes shouldn't be |
|
1371 |
mentioned, but new commands, changes in behaviour or fixed nontrivial |
|
1372 |
bugs should be listed. See the existing entries for an idea of what |
|
1373 |
should be done. |
|
1374 |
||
1375 |
Within each release, entries in the news file should have the most |
|
1376 |
user-visible changes first. So the order should be approximately: |
|
1377 |
||
1378 |
* changes to existing behaviour - the highest priority because the |
|
1379 |
user's existing knowledge is incorrect |
|
1380 |
* new features - should be brought to their attention |
|
1381 |
* bug fixes - may be of interest if the bug was affecting them, and |
|
1382 |
should include the bug number if any |
|
1383 |
* major documentation changes |
|
1384 |
* changes to internal interfaces |
|
1385 |
||
1386 |
People who made significant contributions to each change are listed in |
|
1387 |
parenthesis. This can include reporting bugs (particularly with good |
|
1388 |
details or reproduction recipes), submitting patches, etc. |
|
1389 |
||
1390 |
Commands |
|
1391 |
-------- |
|
1392 |
||
1393 |
The docstring of a command is used by ``bzr help`` to generate help output |
|
1394 |
for the command. The list 'takes_options' attribute on a command is used by |
|
1395 |
``bzr help`` to document the options for the command - the command |
|
1396 |
docstring does not need to document them. Finally, the '_see_also' |
|
1397 |
attribute on a command can be used to reference other related help topics. |
|
1398 |
||
1399 |
API Documentation |
|
1400 |
----------------- |
|
1401 |
||
1402 |
Functions, methods, classes and modules should have docstrings |
|
1403 |
describing how they are used. |
|
1404 |
||
1405 |
The first line of the docstring should be a self-contained sentence. |
|
1406 |
||
1407 |
For the special case of Command classes, this acts as the user-visible |
|
1408 |
documentation shown by the help command. |
|
1409 |
||
1410 |
The docstrings should be formatted as reStructuredText_ (like this |
|
1411 |
document), suitable for processing using the epydoc_ tool into HTML |
|
1412 |
documentation. |
|
1413 |
||
1414 |
.. _reStructuredText: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html |
|
1415 |
.. _epydoc: http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/ |
|
1416 |
||
1417 |
||
1418 |
General Guidelines |
|
1419 |
================== |
|
1420 |
||
1421 |
Copyright |
|
1422 |
--------- |
|
1423 |
||
1424 |
The copyright policy for bzr was recently made clear in this email (edited |
|
1425 |
for grammatical correctness):: |
|
1426 |
||
1427 |
The attached patch cleans up the copyright and license statements in |
|
1428 |
the bzr source. It also adds tests to help us remember to add them |
|
1429 |
with the correct text. |
|
1430 |
||
1431 |
We had the problem that lots of our files were "Copyright Canonical |
|
1432 |
Development Ltd" which is not a real company, and some other variations |
|
1433 |
on this theme. Also, some files were missing the GPL statements. |
|
1434 |
||
1435 |
I want to be clear about the intent of this patch, since copyright can |
|
1436 |
be a little controversial. |
|
1437 |
||
1438 |
1) The big motivation for this is not to shut out the community, but |
|
1439 |
just to clean up all of the invalid copyright statements. |
|
1440 |
||
1441 |
2) It has been the general policy for bzr that we want a single |
|
1442 |
copyright holder for all of the core code. This is following the model |
|
1443 |
set by the FSF, which makes it easier to update the code to a new |
|
1444 |
license in case problems are encountered. (For example, if we want to |
|
1445 |
upgrade the project universally to GPL v3 it is much simpler if there is |
|
1446 |
a single copyright holder). It also makes it clearer if copyright is |
|
1447 |
ever debated, there is a single holder, which makes it easier to defend |
|
1448 |
in court, etc. (I think the FSF position is that if you assign them |
|
1449 |
copyright, they can defend it in court rather than you needing to, and |
|
1450 |
I'm sure Canonical would do the same). |
|
1451 |
As such, Canonical has requested copyright assignments from all of the |
|
1452 |
major contributers. |
|
1453 |
||
1454 |
3) If someone wants to add code and not attribute it to Canonical, there |
|
1455 |
is a specific list of files that are excluded from this check. And the |
|
1456 |
test failure indicates where that is, and how to update it. |
|
1457 |
||
1458 |
4) If anyone feels that I changed a copyright statement incorrectly, just |
|
1459 |
let me know, and I'll be happy to correct it. Whenever you have large |
|
1460 |
mechanical changes like this, it is possible to make some mistakes. |
|
1461 |
||
1462 |
Just to reiterate, this is a community project, and it is meant to stay |
|
1463 |
that way. Core bzr code is copyright Canonical for legal reasons, and |
|
1464 |
the tests are just there to help us maintain that. |
|
1465 |
||
1466 |
||
1467 |
Miscellaneous Topics |
|
1468 |
#################### |
|
1469 |
||
1470 |
Debugging |
|
1471 |
========= |
|
1472 |
||
1473 |
Bazaar has a few facilities to help debug problems by going into pdb_, the |
|
1474 |
Python debugger. |
|
1475 |
||
1476 |
.. _pdb: http://docs.python.org/lib/debugger-commands.html |
|
1477 |
||
1478 |
If the ``BZR_PDB`` environment variable is set |
|
1479 |
then bzr will go into pdb post-mortem mode when an unhandled exception |
|
1480 |
occurs. |
|
1481 |
||
|
2466.6.3
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate feedback from Aaron B. & Alex B. |
1482 |
If you send a SIGQUIT signal to bzr, which can be done by pressing |
1483 |
Ctrl-\\ on Unix, bzr will go into the debugger immediately. You can |
|
1484 |
continue execution by typing ``c``. This can be disabled if necessary |
|
1485 |
by setting the environment variable ``BZR_SIGQUIT_PDB=0``. |
|
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1486 |
|
1487 |
||
1488 |
Jargon |
|
1489 |
====== |
|
1490 |
||
1491 |
revno |
|
1492 |
Integer identifier for a revision on the main line of a branch. |
|
1493 |
Revision 0 is always the null revision; others are 1-based |
|
1494 |
indexes into the branch's revision history. |
|
1495 |
||
1496 |
||
|
1711.2.95
by John Arbash Meinel
Add HACKING note for the self.outf parameter. |
1497 |
Unicode and Encoding Support |
1498 |
============================ |
|
1499 |
||
1500 |
This section discusses various techniques that Bazaar uses to handle |
|
1501 |
characters that are outside the ASCII set. |
|
1502 |
||
1503 |
``Command.outf`` |
|
1504 |
---------------- |
|
1505 |
||
1506 |
When a ``Command`` object is created, it is given a member variable |
|
1507 |
accessible by ``self.outf``. This is a file-like object, which is bound to |
|
1508 |
``sys.stdout``, and should be used to write information to the screen, |
|
1509 |
rather than directly writing to ``sys.stdout`` or calling ``print``. |
|
1510 |
This file has the ability to translate Unicode objects into the correct |
|
|
1711.2.96
by John Arbash Meinel
cleanup from suggestions by Robert and Martin |
1511 |
representation, based on the console encoding. Also, the class attribute |
1512 |
``encoding_type`` will effect how unprintable characters will be |
|
|
1711.2.95
by John Arbash Meinel
Add HACKING note for the self.outf parameter. |
1513 |
handled. This parameter can take one of 3 values: |
1514 |
||
1515 |
replace |
|
|
1711.2.96
by John Arbash Meinel
cleanup from suggestions by Robert and Martin |
1516 |
Unprintable characters will be represented with a suitable replacement |
1517 |
marker (typically '?'), and no exception will be raised. This is for |
|
1518 |
any command which generates text for the user to review, rather than |
|
1519 |
for automated processing. |
|
|
1711.2.95
by John Arbash Meinel
Add HACKING note for the self.outf parameter. |
1520 |
For example: ``bzr log`` should not fail if one of the entries has text |
1521 |
that cannot be displayed. |
|
1522 |
||
1523 |
strict |
|
|
2063.3.1
by wang
fix typos |
1524 |
Attempting to print an unprintable character will cause a UnicodeError. |
|
1711.2.95
by John Arbash Meinel
Add HACKING note for the self.outf parameter. |
1525 |
This is for commands that are intended more as scripting support, rather |
1526 |
than plain user review. |
|
1527 |
For exampl: ``bzr ls`` is designed to be used with shell scripting. One |
|
1528 |
use would be ``bzr ls --null --unknows | xargs -0 rm``. If ``bzr`` |
|
1529 |
printed a filename with a '?', the wrong file could be deleted. (At the |
|
1530 |
very least, the correct file would not be deleted). An error is used to |
|
1531 |
indicate that the requested action could not be performed. |
|
1532 |
||
1533 |
exact |
|
1534 |
Do not attempt to automatically convert Unicode strings. This is used |
|
1535 |
for commands that must handle conversion themselves. |
|
1536 |
For example: ``bzr diff`` needs to translate Unicode paths, but should |
|
1537 |
not change the exact text of the contents of the files. |
|
1538 |
||
1539 |
||
1540 |
``bzrlib.urlutils.unescape_for_display`` |
|
1541 |
---------------------------------------- |
|
1542 |
||
1543 |
Because Transports work in URLs (as defined earlier), printing the raw URL |
|
1544 |
to the user is usually less than optimal. Characters outside the standard |
|
1545 |
set are printed as escapes, rather than the real character, and local |
|
1546 |
paths would be printed as ``file://`` urls. The function |
|
1547 |
``unescape_for_display`` attempts to unescape a URL, such that anything |
|
1548 |
that cannot be printed in the current encoding stays an escaped URL, but |
|
1549 |
valid characters are generated where possible. |
|
1550 |
||
1551 |
||
|
2405.2.2
by Andrew Bennetts
Add a brief section on portability to HACKING. |
1552 |
Portability Tips |
1553 |
================ |
|
1554 |
||
1555 |
The ``bzrlib.osutils`` module has many useful helper functions, including |
|
1556 |
some more portable variants of functions in the standard library. |
|
1557 |
||
1558 |
In particular, don't use ``shutil.rmtree`` unless it's acceptable for it |
|
1559 |
to fail on Windows if some files are readonly or still open elsewhere. |
|
1560 |
Use ``bzrlib.osutils.rmtree`` instead. |
|
1561 |
||
1562 |
||
|
1739.1.2
by Robert Collins
More pyrex finesse, documentation. |
1563 |
C Extension Modules |
1564 |
=================== |
|
1565 |
||
1566 |
We write some extensions in C using pyrex. We design these to work in |
|
1567 |
three scenarios: |
|
|
2449.1.1
by Alexander Belchenko
fix RSTX wrong formatting in HACKING |
1568 |
|
|
1739.1.2
by Robert Collins
More pyrex finesse, documentation. |
1569 |
* User with no C compiler |
1570 |
* User with C compiler |
|
1571 |
* Developers |
|
1572 |
||
1573 |
The recommended way to install bzr is to have a C compiler so that the |
|
1574 |
extensions can be built, but if no C compiler is present, the pure python |
|
1575 |
versions we supply will work, though more slowly. |
|
1576 |
||
1577 |
For developers we recommend that pyrex be installed, so that the C |
|
1578 |
extensions can be changed if needed. |
|
1579 |
||
1580 |
For the C extensions, the extension module should always match the |
|
1581 |
original python one in all respects (modulo speed). This should be |
|
1582 |
maintained over time. |
|
1583 |
||
1584 |
To create an extension, add rules to setup.py for building it with pyrex, |
|
1585 |
and with distutils. Now start with an empty .pyx file. At the top add |
|
1586 |
"include 'yourmodule.py'". This will import the contents of foo.py into this |
|
1587 |
file at build time - remember that only one module will be loaded at |
|
1588 |
runtime. Now you can subclass classes, or replace functions, and only your |
|
1589 |
changes need to be present in the .pyx file. |
|
1590 |
||
1591 |
Note that pyrex does not support all 2.4 programming idioms, so some |
|
1592 |
syntax changes may be required. I.e. |
|
|
2449.1.1
by Alexander Belchenko
fix RSTX wrong formatting in HACKING |
1593 |
|
|
1739.1.2
by Robert Collins
More pyrex finesse, documentation. |
1594 |
- 'from foo import (bar, gam)' needs to change to not use the brackets. |
1595 |
- 'import foo.bar as bar' needs to be 'import foo.bar; bar = foo.bar' |
|
|
2449.1.1
by Alexander Belchenko
fix RSTX wrong formatting in HACKING |
1596 |
|
|
1739.1.2
by Robert Collins
More pyrex finesse, documentation. |
1597 |
If the changes are too dramatic, consider |
1598 |
maintaining the python code twice - once in the .pyx, and once in the .py, |
|
1599 |
and no longer including the .py file. |
|
1600 |
||
|
2466.6.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Expand HACKING into Bazaar Developer Guide |
1601 |
|
1602 |
Making Installers for OS Windows |
|
|
1861.2.19
by Alexander Belchenko
HACKING: mention where to get instructions for building windows installers |
1603 |
================================ |
|
1861.2.20
by Alexander Belchenko
English |
1604 |
To build a win32 installer, see the instructions on the wiki page: |
|
1861.2.19
by Alexander Belchenko
HACKING: mention where to get instructions for building windows installers |
1605 |
http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrWin32Installer |
1606 |
||
1607 |
||
|
2797.1.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Merge Core Developer Hanbook into HACKING |
1608 |
Core Developer Tasks |
1609 |
#################### |
|
1610 |
||
1611 |
Overview |
|
1612 |
======== |
|
1613 |
||
1614 |
What is a Core Developer? |
|
1615 |
------------------------- |
|
1616 |
||
1617 |
While everyone in the Bazaar community is welcome and encouraged to |
|
1618 |
propose and submit changes, a smaller team is reponsible for pulling those |
|
1619 |
changes together into a cohesive whole. In addition to the general developer |
|
1620 |
stuff covered above, "core" developers have responsibility for: |
|
1621 |
||
1622 |
* reviewing changes |
|
1623 |
* reviewing blueprints |
|
1624 |
* planning releases |
|
|
3464.3.15
by Martin Pool
Fix doc hyperlink |
1625 |
* managing releases (see the `Releasing Bazaar <../../developers/releasing.html>`_) |
|
2797.1.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Merge Core Developer Hanbook into HACKING |
1626 |
|
1627 |
.. note:: |
|
1628 |
Removing barriers to community participation is a key reason for adopting |
|
1629 |
distributed VCS technology. While DVCS removes many technical barriers, |
|
1630 |
a small number of social barriers are often necessary instead. |
|
1631 |
By documenting how the above things are done, we hope to |
|
1632 |
encourage more people to participate in these activities, keeping the |
|
1633 |
differences between core and non-core contributors to a minimum. |
|
1634 |
||
1635 |
||
1636 |
Communicating and Coordinating |
|
1637 |
------------------------------ |
|
1638 |
||
1639 |
While it has many advantages, one of the challenges of distributed |
|
1640 |
development is keeping everyone else aware of what you're working on. |
|
1641 |
There are numerous ways to do this: |
|
1642 |
||
1643 |
#. Assign bugs to yourself in Launchpad |
|
1644 |
#. Mention it on the mailing list |
|
1645 |
#. Mention it on IRC |
|
1646 |
||
1647 |
As well as the email notifcations that occur when merge requests are sent |
|
1648 |
and reviewed, you can keep others informed of where you're spending your |
|
1649 |
energy by emailing the **bazaar-commits** list implicitly. To do this, |
|
1650 |
install and configure the Email plugin. One way to do this is add these |
|
1651 |
configuration settings to your central configuration file (e.g. |
|
1652 |
``~/.bazaar/bazaar.conf`` on Linux):: |
|
1653 |
||
1654 |
[DEFAULT] |
|
1655 |
email = Joe Smith <joe.smith@internode.on.net> |
|
1656 |
smtp_server = mail.internode.on.net:25 |
|
1657 |
||
1658 |
Then add these lines for the relevant branches in ``locations.conf``:: |
|
1659 |
||
1660 |
post_commit_to = bazaar-commits@lists.canonical.com |
|
1661 |
post_commit_mailer = smtplib |
|
1662 |
||
1663 |
While attending a sprint, RobertCollins' Dbus plugin is useful for the |
|
1664 |
same reason. See the documentation within the plugin for information on |
|
1665 |
how to set it up and configure it. |
|
1666 |
||
1667 |
||
1668 |
Reviewing Changes |
|
1669 |
================= |
|
1670 |
||
1671 |
Setting Up Your Workspace for Reviews |
|
1672 |
------------------------------------- |
|
1673 |
||
1674 |
TODO: Incorporate John Arbash Meinel's detailed email to Ian C on the |
|
1675 |
numerous ways of setting up integration branches. |
|
1676 |
||
1677 |
||
1678 |
The Review Checklist |
|
1679 |
-------------------- |
|
1680 |
||
|
2797.1.2
by Ian Clatworthy
Incorporate review feedback from poolie |
1681 |
See `A Closer Look at the Merge & Review Process`_ |
1682 |
for information on the gates used to decide whether code can be merged |
|
1683 |
or not and details on how review results are recorded and communicated. |
|
1684 |
||
1685 |
||
1686 |
The Importance of Timely Reviews |
|
1687 |
-------------------------------- |
|
|
2797.1.1
by Ian Clatworthy
Merge Core Developer Hanbook into HACKING |
1688 |
|
1689 |
Good reviews do take time. They also regularly require a solid |
|
1690 |
understanding of the overall code base. In practice, this means a small |
|
1691 |
number of people often have a large review burden - with knowledge comes |
|
1692 |
responsibility. No one like their merge requests sitting in a queue going |
|
1693 |
nowhere, so reviewing sooner rather than later is strongly encouraged. |
|
1694 |
||
1695 |
||
1696 |
Submitting Changes |
|
1697 |
================== |
|
1698 |
||
1699 |
An Overview of PQM |
|
1700 |
------------------ |
|
1701 |
||
1702 |
Of the many workflows supported by Bazaar, the one adopted for Bazaar |
|
1703 |
development itself is known as "Decentralized with automatic gatekeeper". |
|
1704 |
To repeat the explanation of this given on |
|
1705 |
http://bazaar-vcs.org/Workflows: |
|
1706 |
||
1707 |
.. pull-quote:: |
|
1708 |
In this workflow, each developer has their own branch or |
|
1709 |
branches, plus read-only access to the mainline. A software gatekeeper |
|
1710 |
(e.g. PQM) has commit rights to the main branch. When a developer wants |
|
1711 |
their work merged, they request the gatekeeper to merge it. The gatekeeper |
|
1712 |
does a merge, a compile, and runs the test suite. If the code passes, it |
|
1713 |
is merged into the mainline. |
|
1714 |
||
1715 |
In a nutshell, here's the overall submission process: |
|
1716 |
||
1717 |
#. get your work ready (including review except for trivial changes) |
|
1718 |
#. push to a public location |
|
1719 |
#. ask PQM to merge from that location |
|
1720 |
||
1721 |
.. note:: |
|
1722 |
At present, PQM always takes the changes to merge from a branch |
|
1723 |
at a URL that can be read by it. For Bazaar, that means a public, |
|
1724 |
typically http, URL. |
|
1725 |
||
1726 |
As a result, the following things are needed to use PQM for submissions: |
|
1727 |
||
1728 |
#. A publicly available web server |
|
1729 |
#. Your OpenPGP key registered with PQM (contact RobertCollins for this) |
|
1730 |
#. The PQM plugin installed and configured (not strictly required but |
|
1731 |
highly recommended). |
|
1732 |
||
1733 |
||
1734 |
Selecting a Public Branch Location |
|
1735 |
---------------------------------- |
|
1736 |
||
1737 |
If you don't have your own web server running, branches can always be |
|
1738 |
pushed to Launchpad. Here's the process for doing that: |
|
1739 |
||
1740 |
Depending on your location throughout the world and the size of your |
|
1741 |
repository though, it is often quicker to use an alternative public |
|
1742 |
location to Launchpad, particularly if you can set up your own repo and |
|
1743 |
push into that. By using an existing repo, push only needs to send the |
|
1744 |
changes, instead of the complete repository every time. Note that it is |
|
1745 |
easy to register branches in other locations with Launchpad so no benefits |
|
1746 |
are lost by going this way. |
|
1747 |
||
1748 |
.. note:: |
|
1749 |
For Canonical staff, http://people.ubuntu.com/~<user>/ is one |
|
1750 |
suggestion for public http branches. Contact your manager for information |
|
1751 |
on accessing this system if required. |
|
1752 |
||
1753 |
It should also be noted that best practice in this area is subject to |
|
1754 |
change as things evolve. For example, once the Bazaar smart server on |
|
1755 |
Launchpad supports server-side branching, the performance situation will |
|
1756 |
be very different to what it is now (Jun 2007). |
|
1757 |
||
1758 |
||
1759 |
Configuring the PQM Plug-In |
|
1760 |
--------------------------- |
|
1761 |
||
1762 |
While not strictly required, the PQM plugin automates a few things and |
|
1763 |
reduces the chance of error. Before looking at the plugin, it helps to |
|
1764 |
understand a little more how PQM operates. Basically, PQM requires an |
|
1765 |
email indicating what you want it to do. The email typically looks like |
|
1766 |
this:: |
|
1767 |
||
1768 |
star-merge source-branch target-branch |
|
1769 |
||
1770 |
For example:: |
|
1771 |
||
1772 |
star-merge http://bzr.arbash-meinel.com/branches/bzr/jam-integration http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev |
|
1773 |
||
1774 |
Note that the command needs to be on one line. The subject of the email |
|
1775 |
will be used for the commit message. The email also needs to be ``gpg`` |
|
1776 |
signed with a key that PQM accepts. |
|
1777 |
||
1778 |
The advantages of using the PQM plugin are: |
|
1779 |
||
1780 |
#. You can use the config policies to make it easy to set up public |
|
1781 |
branches, so you don't have to ever type the full paths you want to merge |
|
1782 |
from or into. |
|
1783 |
||
1784 |
#. It checks to make sure the public branch last revision matches the |
|
1785 |
local last revision so you are submitting what you think you are. |
|
1786 |
||
1787 |
#. It uses the same public_branch and smtp sending settings as bzr-email, |
|
1788 |
so if you have one set up, you have the other mostly set up. |
|
1789 |
||
1790 |
#. Thunderbird refuses to not wrap lines, and request lines are usually |
|
1791 |
pretty long (you have 2 long URLs in there). |
|
1792 |
||
1793 |
Here are sample configuration settings for the PQM plugin. Here are the |
|
1794 |
lines in bazaar.conf:: |
|
1795 |
||
1796 |
[DEFAULT] |
|
1797 |
email = Joe Smith <joe.smith@internode.on.net> |
|
1798 |
smtp_server=mail.internode.on.net:25 |
|
1799 |
||
1800 |
And here are the lines in ``locations.conf`` (or ``branch.conf`` for |
|
1801 |
dirstate-tags branches):: |
|
1802 |
||
1803 |
[/home/joe/bzr/my-integration] |
|
1804 |
push_location = sftp://joe-smith@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ejoe-smith/bzr/my-integration/ |
|
1805 |
push_location:policy = norecurse |
|
1806 |
public_branch = http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~joe-smith/bzr/my-integration/ |
|
1807 |
public_branch:policy = appendpath |
|
1808 |
pqm_email = Bazaar PQM <pqm@bazaar-vcs.org> |
|
1809 |
pqm_branch = http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev |
|
1810 |
||
1811 |
Note that the push settings will be added by the first ``push`` on |
|
1812 |
a branch. Indeed the preferred way to generate the lines above is to use |
|
1813 |
``push`` with an argument, then copy-and-paste the other lines into |
|
1814 |
the relevant file. |
|
1815 |
||
1816 |
||
1817 |
Submitting a Change |
|
1818 |
------------------- |
|
1819 |
||
1820 |
Here is one possible recipe once the above environment is set up: |
|
1821 |
||
1822 |
#. pull bzr.dev => my-integration |
|
1823 |
#. merge patch => my-integration |
|
1824 |
#. fix up any final merge conflicts (NEWS being the big killer here). |
|
1825 |
#. commit |
|
1826 |
#. push |
|
1827 |
#. pqm-submit |
|
1828 |
||
1829 |
.. note:: |
|
1830 |
The ``push`` step is not required if ``my-integration`` is a checkout of |
|
1831 |
a public branch. |
|
1832 |
||
1833 |
Because of defaults, you can type a single message into commit and |
|
1834 |
pqm-commit will reuse that. |
|
1835 |
||
1836 |
||
1837 |
Tracking Change Acceptance |
|
1838 |
-------------------------- |
|
1839 |
||
1840 |
The web interface to PQM is https://pqm.bazaar-vcs.org/. After submitting |
|
1841 |
a change, you can visit this URL to confirm it was received and placed in |
|
1842 |
PQM's queue. |
|
1843 |
||
1844 |
When PQM completes processing a change, an email is sent to you with the |
|
1845 |
results. |
|
1846 |
||
1847 |
||
1848 |
Reviewing Blueprints |
|
1849 |
==================== |
|
1850 |
||
1851 |
Blueprint Tracking Using Launchpad |
|
1852 |
---------------------------------- |
|
1853 |
||
1854 |
New features typically require a fair amount of discussion, design and |
|
1855 |
debate. For Bazaar, that information is often captured in a so-called |
|
1856 |
"blueprint" on our Wiki. Overall tracking of blueprints and their status |
|
1857 |
is done using Launchpad's relevant tracker, |
|
1858 |
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bzr/. Once a blueprint for ready for |
|
1859 |
review, please announce it on the mailing list. |
|
1860 |
||
1861 |
Alternatively, send an email begining with [RFC] with the proposal to the |
|
1862 |
list. In some cases, you may wish to attach proposed code or a proposed |
|
1863 |
developer document if that best communicates the idea. Debate can then |
|
1864 |
proceed using the normal merge review processes. |
|
1865 |
||
1866 |
||
1867 |
Recording Blueprint Review Feedback |
|
1868 |
----------------------------------- |
|
1869 |
||
1870 |
Unlike its Bug Tracker, Launchpad's Blueprint Tracker doesn't currently |
|
1871 |
(Jun 2007) support a chronological list of comment responses. Review |
|
1872 |
feedback can either be recorded on the Wiki hosting the blueprints or by |
|
1873 |
using Launchpad's whiteboard feature. |
|
1874 |
||
1875 |
||
1876 |
Planning Releases |
|
1877 |
================= |
|
1878 |
||
1879 |
Roadmaps |
|
1880 |
-------- |
|
1881 |
||
1882 |
As the two senior developers, Martin Pool and Robert Collins coordinate |
|
1883 |
the overall Bazaar product development roadmap. Core developers provide |
|
1884 |
input and review into this, particularly during sprints. It's totally |
|
1885 |
expected that community members ought to be working on things that |
|
1886 |
interest them the most. The roadmap is valuable though because it provides |
|
1887 |
context for understanding where the product is going as a whole and why. |
|
1888 |
||
1889 |
||
1890 |
Using Releases and Milestones in Launchpad |
|
1891 |
------------------------------------------ |
|
1892 |
||
1893 |
TODO ... (Exact policies still under discussion) |
|
1894 |
||
1895 |
||
1896 |
Bug Triage |
|
1897 |
---------- |
|
1898 |
||
1899 |
Keeping on top of bugs reported is an important part of ongoing release |
|
1900 |
planning. Everyone in the community is welcome and encouraged to raise |
|
1901 |
bugs, confirm bugs raised by others, and nominate a priority. Practically |
|
1902 |
though, a good percentage of bug triage is often done by the core |
|
1903 |
developers, partially because of their depth of product knowledge. |
|
1904 |
||
1905 |
With respect to bug triage, core developers are encouraged to play an |
|
1906 |
active role with particular attention to the following tasks: |
|
1907 |
||
1908 |
* keeping the number of unconfirmed bugs low |
|
1909 |
* ensuring the priorities are generally right (everything as critical - or |
|
1910 |
medium - is meaningless) |
|
1911 |
* looking out for regressions and turning those around sooner rather than later. |
|
1912 |
||
1913 |
.. note:: |
|
1914 |
As well as prioritizing bugs and nominating them against a |
|
1915 |
target milestone, Launchpad lets core developers offer to mentor others in |
|
|
3383.2.6
by Martin Pool
doc tone moderation |
1916 |
fixing them. |
|
3314.1.1
by Martin Pool
Add Developer's Guide text about PPA builds |
1917 |
|
1918 |
||
|
2475.2.4
by Martin Pool
HACKING rest fixes from jam |
1919 |
.. |
1920 |
vim: ft=rst tw=74 ai |