/brz/remove-bazaar

To get this branch, use:
bzr branch http://gegoxaren.bato24.eu/bzr/brz/remove-bazaar

  • Committer: John Arbash Meinel
  • Date: 2009-10-13 16:44:43 UTC
  • Revision ID: john@arbash-meinel.com-20091013164443-b92lnyiir2ucyguj
Stop using hash() because of bugs wrt pyrex 0.9.8.5

Rather than going directly to the Py_TYPE() object, I also use PyObject_Hash()
everywhere now. This simplifies the code a little bit, as I can declare it
returns -1 as an exception, rather than having to manually check the return
value.

What is really strange is that pyrex 0.9.7.2 gets it right, strange
regression to have. cython 0.11.3 also gets it right, but I don't know
that all versions of cython handle it correctly, either.


The main problem is that we are mixing, and then comparing
'other_hash = this_hash'. If we always used the 32-bit form, we would
be okay for our purposes, or always use the 64-bit form. I'm focusing
on the latter.

Filename Latest Rev Last Changed Committer Comment Size
..
__init__.py 4449.3.45 16 years ago Martin Pool Add CannedInputUIFactory.assert_all_input_consumed 11.9 KB Diff Download File
text.py 4593 16 years ago Canonical.com Patch Queue Manager (robertc) Partial overhaul of check to do less dup 13.1 KB Diff Download File