/brz/remove-bazaar

To get this branch, use:
bzr branch http://gegoxaren.bato24.eu/bzr/brz/remove-bazaar

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to doc/monotone.txt

  • Committer: Martin Pool
  • Date: 2005-06-27 01:36:22 UTC
  • Revision ID: mbp@sourcefrog.net-20050627013622-0d56be3e3105043e
Merge from aaron:

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 763
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 17:30:28 -0400
message:
  Copy files in immutable stores directly.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 762
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 16:12:33 -0400
message:
  Fixed direct call of get_url in RemoteBranch.get_revision
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 761
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 12:00:31 -0400
message:
  Added prefetch support to update_revisions
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 760
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 11:57:54 -0400
message:
  Added cache support to branch and pull
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 759
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 11:21:37 -0400
message:
  Added find_cached_branch to branch
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 758
committer: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
timestamp: Thu 2005-06-23 11:17:10 -0400
message:
  Added CachedStore type to reduce remote downloads

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
doc/monotone.txt
 
1
********************
 
2
Thoughts on Monotone
 
3
********************
 
4
 
 
5
Great project, but not perfect.
 
6
 
 
7
My main feeling is that it exposes too much mechanism and in the wrong
 
8
ways.  For example, hashes are all very well for representing
 
9
identity, but I don't want to see them; I just want to say "r43 of
 
10
this branch".  
 
11
 
 
12
Cryptographic signing is good for making sure revisions are really
 
13
what they claim to be, but I don't want to directly deal with it: I
 
14
want it as a check that things are really happening as they should
 
15
be.  It should be barely seen and not heard unless/until something
 
16
goes wrong.